Article

Quest to reopen Midnight Pass hits snag

COURTESY ARCHIVE PHOTO / SARASOTA COUNTY
In 1983, Sarasota County and the state allowed two Siesta Key homeowners to relocate Midnight Pass, which threatened to undermine their beachfront homes. The pass did not stay open at the new site.
Published: Thursday, December 4, 2008 at 1:00 a.m.
Last Modified: Thursday, December 4, 2008 at 10:18 a.m.

SARASOTA COUNTY - The $15 million plan to reopen Midnight Pass is getting tough reviews from federal regulators, most notably from a permits chief with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers who equates the complex project with the building of the Panama Canal.

"It sure is grandiose and expensive and appears to be good masters or PhD thesis material," the Corps' Mike Nowicki wrote in an e-mail to an official at the National Marine Fisheries Service, which is also reviewing the project.

"It is time to drop the hammer on this project and DENY it for both of us," Nowicki wrote in an October e-mail to a top Florida Department of Environmental Protection official.

Past attempts to reopen the pass have drawn state and federal opposition. The last rejection came in 1991, when Nowicki, among others, recommended it be denied. The Corps is one of four federal regulatory agencies that have concerns about this latest effort to reopen the pass.

The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission is also objecting to the project. In a Nov. 4 letter, a commission official wrote "the ecological impacts associated with the project outweigh any potential benefits; therefore, we cannot support issuance of a permit for this project as proposed."

County officials expressed surprise at the vehemence of Nowicki's e-mails on Wednesday, but were still optimistic about eventually getting a permit.

County Administrator Jim Ley noted that his staff has worked successfully with Nowicki on past projects and found him to be fair.

"I think that it's unfortunate that kind of dialogue has to go on in e-mails or in letters that we sort of find out of context, but we're not going to react to it too directly right now," he said.

Even if state and federal agencies approve the project, it is unclear where the county will find the money to pay for it.

Midnight Pass has been a hot-button local issue since 1983, when artist Syd Solomon and a neighbor bulldozed the shallow channel closed to save their homes. Boaters and residents in the Midnight Pass Society have helped keep the issue alive both as a Siesta Key area cause and a factor in local politics.

Nowicki's e-mails bolster arguments made by pass opponents, which include environmentalists and homeowners on Casey Key, who feel their beaches have grown since the pass closed.

"He's the reviewer," Tallahassee attorney Ken Oertel, who represents North Casey Key Homeowners, said of Nowicki. "I've never seen much stronger language than in his e-mail."

In light of the correspondence between state and federal regulators, Oertel called the county's effort to reopen the pass hopeless.

In one e-mail, Nowicki questioned the need for the project: "It exhibits to me the same old problem, let's destroy the existing ecosystem that has reached equilibrium over the last 25 years and replace with one that is different but not necessarily better and monitor it for 3-15 years."

The Corps declined comment except to say that it was reviewing Sarasota County's application and its attempt to address concerns by the EPA and the fisheries service.

As for Nowicki's comments, the agency issued a statement: "The Corps does not comment on statements made by employees in e-mails concerning the application process."

Nowicki has also made supportive comments about the Midnight Pass project in the past, said Karyn Erickson, the coastal engineer the county signed to a $910,000 contract to manage the application process, now in its fourth year.

This is what federal officials do when a huge application comes across their desks, Erickson said.

"They whine and complain a lot and try to find a way out of reviewing the project," she said.

Erickson disputes Nowicki's comments about the county not addressing the various concerns.

The county has sent in detailed information about how the project will not only reopen the pass, but will create a 400-acre managed area where invasive species like Australian pines will be replaced with mangroves, and fish nurseries will thrive in man-made lagoons.

Reopening the pass will also improve how Little Sarasota Bay flushes into the Gulf of Mexico, Erickson said. She estimates clearer, less polluted water will encourage the growth of 86 acres of seagrass, which in turn will be the home for juvenile fish.

State officials have already agreed that the shorter trip through a reopened pass would lessen the number of times manatees suffer propeller strikes, she added.

When it comes to asking permission from regulators, "the default position is always no," said Bob Waechter, president of the Midnight Pass Society, which has long lobbied to reopen the pass.

Last year's South Siesta Key renourishment was delayed for several years by regulators who said it should not be done, Waechter noted. "Renourishment was a project that couldn't happen, then there was a trip to Washington and all the questions got answered," he said. "There were insurmountable obstacles and then they all got surmounted."


This story appeared in print on page A1

Comments

    Post a comment | View all comments on this topic.
  1. TNUT says...
    December 4, 2008 4:26:25 am

    RE: Link
    This is very sad. I grew up on the water in Coral Cove, and went to midnight pass every weekend with my parents. I remember swimming in the old mote shark tanks......the water was pristine then and it is a toilet now. To say that the conditions has equilized is a joke, the conditions are equal to an unflushed toilet. Ask the real locals who used the pass and they will tell you about fishing and water quality. I personally struggled for 6 years getting a dredging permit and it was very depressing at times, but it can be done.

    Report this post

  2. herald says...
    December 4, 2008 4:40:09 am

    See the existing discussion
    Link

    Report this post

  3. budsrq says...
    December 4, 2008 5:26:41 am

    If then,(1983) the powers to be spent the large amounts of money, instead of on studies and heavy equipment.They could of bought out the homeowners and had the homes become a jetty to stop the natual flow and we would still be playing and fishing in the pass.

    Report this post

  4. bwcpausa says...
    December 4, 2008 5:29:18 am

    It was a bad project 15 plus years ago and it still is. The only difference is $900k in consulting fees and who knows how much staff time and other costs supporting the consultant's efforts. The solution to pollution is the same now as it was in 1991. STOP POLLUTING. Our bays aren't dirty because there's no sewage line to the Gulf of Mexico (aka artificial pass) They are dirty because we use them like a sewer to hold all our runoff of pesticides, petroleum leakage and other crap.

    Report this post

  5. wtk wtk says...
    December 4, 2008 5:33:29 am

    Hey I have an idea how about spending the "visitor's tax dollars" on Opening Midnight Pass...instead of spending $65M of it on a NON WINNING BASEBALL TEAM!!! GET IT GOT IT GET IT GOT IT!!!

    Report this post

  6. retroactive says...
    December 4, 2008 6:17:09 am

    My grandparents also had a home on the water in Coral Cove and before the pass closed, we often went out and fished and picked sea urchins and picknicked on a small stretch on the very north end of Casey Key. The water was clear as a bell. After it closed, we gradually noticed a huge difference in the water quality in little Sarasota Bay and it just got worse and worse over the years. Look at the rest of Sarasota's bays and see how they're being renewed. The real issue here is just the same old same oldâ?? that the rich people on both keys are still pushing to keep it closed and, just like those IDIOTS that fought to raise the Dona Bay bridge in Nokomis, they have the money to hire the mouthpieces to represent their special interests. It's time this crap stopped and people started paying attention to our environment.

    Report this post

  7. retroactive says...
    December 4, 2008 6:23:16 am

    This is exactly right. But who now on the north end of Casey Key wants their little enclave of wealth accessed by "those people"? The immediate waterfront easement should belong to the people of the state like it does everywhere else. And like this poster says, doing nothing just ends up costing more in the long run, both in dollars, ecological impact, and in lost opportunity for tourism and for ALL the people of the state, not just those who can buy off the government.

    Report this post

  8. opinion says...
    December 4, 2008 6:29:01 am

    Where was Nowicki's or his clone when Syd Solomon and "a neighbor" made a unilateral decision to bulldoze the channel and change the ecosystem in 1983? Why are the North Casey Key residents homes and quality of life more important and of more value than the residents who live on the polluted creek upstream?

    Report this post

  9. patnok says...
    December 4, 2008 6:29:10 am

    Right On!

    Report this post

  10. mafsurf says...
    December 4, 2008 6:33:24 am

    Finally someone is talking about the big picture. I was a fan of opening the pass until I did some homework and realized what was really being proposed. This is a gigantic and very costly project and nobody knows if it will work. I have kept a boat on Siesta and recognize that it would be faster to get to the Gulf through Midnight pass but at what cost? If a few homeowners could close the pass with a bulldozer overnight, it was closing anyway...and that was 25 years ago. Midnight Pass has moved many times according to an earlier article Doug Sword wrote. This project has undefined expenses for 3-15 years to ensure it stays open and stays in the same place-when historically that has not happened. Can the engineer guarantee the work? I thought it was just "undoing a bad deed" involving a quick and easy dredging project through sand but it is much more like the Panama Canal. I just looked at Link and it tells a more complete story of what is involved.

    Report this post

Next Article in